On 2011-07-20, Torsten Curdt wrote: >> Personally I don't expect anybody to use the JAR package at all today >> so I'd do with a warning, apply the patch and keep 1.2 as the version >> number for the next release. Other options would be the "convoluted >> implementation", "just don't fix it" or a bump to version 2.0.
> Haven't looked at the diff but from your description I am OK with > applying it for 1.2. I'll postpone the question of version number for now since I seriously started to look into dealing with the common owner and permissions fields in the various ArchiveEntry implementations and this may lead to more backwards incompatible changes anyway. Stefan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
