On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 5:30 PM, Torsten Curdt <tcu...@vafer.org> wrote: >> Personally I don't expect anybody to use the JAR package at all today >> so I'd do with a warning, apply the patch and keep 1.2 as the version >> number for the next release. Other options would be the "convoluted >> implementation", "just don't fix it" or a bump to version 2.0. > > Haven't looked at the diff but from your description I am OK with > applying it for 1.2. > Can hardly imagine anyone using the current jar stuff anyway. No need for 2.0.
Should it be deprecated and removed in 2.0 then? Gary > > cheers, > Torsten > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > -- Thank you, Gary http://garygregory.wordpress.com/ http://garygregory.com/ http://people.apache.org/~ggregory/ http://twitter.com/GaryGregory --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
