Also, maybe we would like to add combinations of the four posibilities, to get LEFT_ABOVE_SIDE, RIGHT_ABOVE_SIDE, LEFT_BELOW_SIDE, and RIGHT_BELOW_SIDE? This would not only allow for splitting the solution on a single axis, but also on a combination of both axes.
Dennis ________________________________________ Van: Hendriks, D. [d.hendr...@tue.nl] Verzonden: woensdag 6 juli 2011 18:43 Aan: Commons Developers List Onderwerp: RE: [math] puzzled by generics in root solvers I agree that since we now have LEFT_SIDE, RIGHT_SIDE, ABOVE_SIDE, and BELOW_SIDE, it makes sense to rename it to ANY_SIDE. Previously, when we only had the first two, it made more sense to have EITHER_SIDE. Dennis ________________________________________ Van: Gilles Sadowski [gil...@harfang.homelinux.org] Verzonden: woensdag 6 juli 2011 12:03 Aan: dev@commons.apache.org Onderwerp: Re: [math] puzzled by generics in root solvers On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 07:45:47PM -0700, Ted Dunning wrote: > Why? > > On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 2:34 PM, Gilles Sadowski < > gil...@harfang.homelinux.org> wrote: > > > By the way, shouldn't "EITHER_SIDE" be renamed to "ANY_SIDE"? > > Because there are more than two sides. Gilles --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
