On 27 June 2011 22:31, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 27 June 2011 11:13, Gilles Sadowski <gil...@harfang.homelinux.org> wrote: >> On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 12:16:05AM +0100, sebb wrote: >>> On 26 June 2011 18:02, <er...@apache.org> wrote: >>> > Author: erans >>> > Date: Sun Jun 26 17:02:20 2011 >>> > New Revision: 1139837 >>> > >>> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1139837&view=rev >>> > Log: >>> > MATH-599 >>> > Name change to avoid test failure on the automated build system ("gump"). >>> >>> Actually, the failure is nothing to do with Gump per se. >>> The test fails with Ant, because JUnit does not like abstract files. >> >> This why the test failed. But the reason for the change was that two >> standard tool suites ("maven" vs "gump") did not provide the same result. >> Of course I didn't mean that there was a bug in "gump", but that gump >> reported failure while maven did not. > > You might as well say that Continuum did not report failure, but Gump did. > > Gump can use either Ant or Maven, so the message is misleading.
Also, the fix works for stand-alone Ant, which is more to the point. > >> >> Gilles >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >> >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
