On 27 June 2011 11:13, Gilles Sadowski <gil...@harfang.homelinux.org> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 12:16:05AM +0100, sebb wrote: >> On 26 June 2011 18:02, <er...@apache.org> wrote: >> > Author: erans >> > Date: Sun Jun 26 17:02:20 2011 >> > New Revision: 1139837 >> > >> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1139837&view=rev >> > Log: >> > MATH-599 >> > Name change to avoid test failure on the automated build system ("gump"). >> >> Actually, the failure is nothing to do with Gump per se. >> The test fails with Ant, because JUnit does not like abstract files. > > This why the test failed. But the reason for the change was that two > standard tool suites ("maven" vs "gump") did not provide the same result. > Of course I didn't mean that there was a bug in "gump", but that gump > reported failure while maven did not.
You might as well say that Continuum did not report failure, but Gump did. Gump can use either Ant or Maven, so the message is misleading. > > Gilles > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
