I think there are some naming conventions. Try using Abstract in the name 
(there are other examples in our tests base) so that gump doesn't attempt to 
run it directly.
-- 
Envoyé de mon téléphone Android avec K-9 Mail. Excusez la brièveté.


Gilles Sadowski <gil...@harfang.homelinux.org> a écrit :

Hello.

Thanks to Dennis, the "BaseSecantSolverTest" is an elegant solution for
testing its subclass with the least amount of duplicate code. However, it
doesn't work on the automatic build machine (gump)...
On my machine, it seems to work as expected: The "BaseSecantSolverTest"
class itself is not instantiated (i.e. it is not run when doing "mvn test").
Is it a configuration problem (Junit version, JVM version)?


Regards,
Gilles

_____________________________________________

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Reply via email to