On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 12:41:09AM +0200, Luc Maisonobe wrote: > I think there are some naming conventions. Try using Abstract in the name > (there are other examples in our tests base) so that gump doesn't attempt to > run it directly.
I can understand that there would be some version difference between tools run locally and by gump (e.g. the Java version target set to 1.5) but why would gump have other conventions for picking up test classes than what is defined in the "commons-math" configuration (supposing everything necessary is defined in trunk...). Regards, Gilles --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
