Hi Rahul, I forgot to notify you the clirr report[1] is now online, unfortunately is not really useful due to repackaging :( I'll wait for more feedbacks from you before calling a vote for the merge - in the meanwhile I'll continue developing on Sandbox with the aim to prepare the 3.0 release. Have a nice day, all the best!!! Simo
[1] http://commons.apache.org/sandbox/digester3/clirr-report.html http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://www.99soft.org/ On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 4:25 PM, Simone Tripodi <simonetrip...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi Rahul! > thanks for your kind feedback :) I'm going to plug the clirr plugin > and redeploy the site so we can have a better overview about what > changed. > The last point is indeed very important for users, the first attempt > broke that kind of compatibility that maybe was too rude :P > I'll let you know as soon as the new site is online! > Thanks! > Simo > > http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ > http://www.99soft.org/ > > > > On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 4:15 PM, Rahul Akolkar <rahul.akol...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 1:46 AM, Simone Tripodi <simonetrip...@apache.org> >> wrote: >>> Hi Rahul :) >>> thanks for following up! >>> >>> I can confirm they're NOT binary compatible even without running >>> clirr, because of the following reasons: >>> >> <snip/> >> >> We'll need to analyze with clirr anyway, minimally to produce good >> release notes and 2.x -> 3.0 migration notes. >> >> Not all breaks are equal, so in below: >> >>> - deprecated APIs don't exist anymore; >> <snap/> >> >> Permissible in major release. >> >>> - internals of annotations/xml modules have been rewritten as EDSL >>> extensions; >>> - some Digester methods changed signature, like Digester.pushParams( >>> Object object ) versus the new Digester.pushParams( Object... object ) >> <snip/> >> >> Above may be OK. >> >>> - due to all these changes, I took advantage to repackage classes to >>> org.apache.commons.digester3 >>> >> <snap/> >> >> +1 to repackage. >> >>> Anyway I didn't break the pure Digester use as I did in the previous >>> attempt, users are still able to bin rules using the usual pattern >>> >>> Digester d = new Digester(); >>> d.addObjectCreate("foo", "mypackage.Foo"); >>> ... >>> >> <snip/> >> >> This is useful IMO. >> >> -Rahul >> >> >>> I would really appreciate if you have spare time to have a look at the >>> code, I immagine you are quiet busy but there's no rush ;) >>> Have a nice day, all the best!!! >>> Simo >>> >>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ >>> http://www.99soft.org/ >>> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 12:08 AM, Rahul Akolkar <rahul.akol...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>>> On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 5:46 PM, Simone Tripodi >>>> <simonetrip...@apache.org> wrote: >>>>> New site is online, does someone have some spare time to check[1] and >>>>> provide feedbacks about the merge proposal? >>>> <snip/> >>>> >>>> Don't have much time, but if its now compatible with 2.x thats a good >>>> thing :-) You may want to confirm using a clirr or equivalent report. >>>> >>>> -Rahul >>>> >>>> >>>>> Thanks in advance, have a nice day!!! >>>>> Simo >>>>> >>>>> [1] http://commons.apache.org/sandbox/digester3/ >>>>> >>>>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ >>>>> http://www.99soft.org/ >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 6:41 PM, Simone Tripodi >>>>> <simonetrip...@apache.org> wrote: >>>>>> Hi all guys, >>>>>> after some day of work on Sandbox, I'm back to propose once again the >>>>>> merge of my work in proper /trunk. >>>>>> Failing my first attempt was good, because I had the opportunity to >>>>>> learn a lot and this time the proposal is much better :P >>>>>> >>>>>> What I did: >>>>>> >>>>>> - moved the current sandbox in a separate branch; >>>>>> - copied the current trunk in sandbox; >>>>>> - polished APIs (few trivial checkstyle violations yet), removed >>>>>> @Deprecated methods, added more power with generics; >>>>>> - re-introduced - simplifying! - the Digester EDSL; >>>>>> - removed old custom DigesterLoader for annotations/xml package. >>>>>> >>>>>> So, at the end of the day, this time users are still able to create >>>>>> Digester instances using the old-fashioned APIs - even if they're >>>>>> encouraged to use the more expressive fluent APIs - except when using >>>>>> annotations/XML extensions. >>>>>> >>>>>> I still have to publish the site - it's the site on /trunk + EDSL >>>>>> documentation - I'll do it as soon as I'll get home (I'm leaving the >>>>>> office now) so you can see how APIs/Doc look >>>>>> >>>>>> Anyway interested people can start having a look at the component code >>>>>> on SVN[1] >>>>>> >>>>>> Please send huge feedbacks!!! >>>>>> Have a nice day! >>>>>> Simo >>>>>> >>>>>> [1] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/sandbox/digester3/trunk >>>>>> >>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ >>>>>> http://www.99soft.org/ >>>>>> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >> >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
