On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 1:46 AM, Simone Tripodi <simonetrip...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi Rahul :)
> thanks for following up!
>
> I can confirm they're NOT binary compatible even without running
> clirr, because of the following reasons:
>
<snip/>
We'll need to analyze with clirr anyway, minimally to produce good
release notes and 2.x -> 3.0 migration notes.
Not all breaks are equal, so in below:
> - deprecated APIs don't exist anymore;
<snap/>
Permissible in major release.
> - internals of annotations/xml modules have been rewritten as EDSL
> extensions;
> - some Digester methods changed signature, like Digester.pushParams(
> Object object ) versus the new Digester.pushParams( Object... object )
<snip/>
Above may be OK.
> - due to all these changes, I took advantage to repackage classes to
> org.apache.commons.digester3
>
<snap/>
+1 to repackage.
> Anyway I didn't break the pure Digester use as I did in the previous
> attempt, users are still able to bin rules using the usual pattern
>
> Digester d = new Digester();
> d.addObjectCreate("foo", "mypackage.Foo");
> ...
>
<snip/>
This is useful IMO.
-Rahul
> I would really appreciate if you have spare time to have a look at the
> code, I immagine you are quiet busy but there's no rush ;)
> Have a nice day, all the best!!!
> Simo
>
> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
> http://www.99soft.org/
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 12:08 AM, Rahul Akolkar <rahul.akol...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>> On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 5:46 PM, Simone Tripodi
>> <simonetrip...@apache.org> wrote:
>>> New site is online, does someone have some spare time to check[1] and
>>> provide feedbacks about the merge proposal?
>> <snip/>
>>
>> Don't have much time, but if its now compatible with 2.x thats a good
>> thing :-) You may want to confirm using a clirr or equivalent report.
>>
>> -Rahul
>>
>>
>>> Thanks in advance, have a nice day!!!
>>> Simo
>>>
>>> [1] http://commons.apache.org/sandbox/digester3/
>>>
>>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
>>> http://www.99soft.org/
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 6:41 PM, Simone Tripodi
>>> <simonetrip...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>> Hi all guys,
>>>> after some day of work on Sandbox, I'm back to propose once again the
>>>> merge of my work in proper /trunk.
>>>> Failing my first attempt was good, because I had the opportunity to
>>>> learn a lot and this time the proposal is much better :P
>>>>
>>>> What I did:
>>>>
>>>> - moved the current sandbox in a separate branch;
>>>> - copied the current trunk in sandbox;
>>>> - polished APIs (few trivial checkstyle violations yet), removed
>>>> @Deprecated methods, added more power with generics;
>>>> - re-introduced - simplifying! - the Digester EDSL;
>>>> - removed old custom DigesterLoader for annotations/xml package.
>>>>
>>>> So, at the end of the day, this time users are still able to create
>>>> Digester instances using the old-fashioned APIs - even if they're
>>>> encouraged to use the more expressive fluent APIs - except when using
>>>> annotations/XML extensions.
>>>>
>>>> I still have to publish the site - it's the site on /trunk + EDSL
>>>> documentation - I'll do it as soon as I'll get home (I'm leaving the
>>>> office now) so you can see how APIs/Doc look
>>>>
>>>> Anyway interested people can start having a look at the component code on
>>>> SVN[1]
>>>>
>>>> Please send huge feedbacks!!!
>>>> Have a nice day!
>>>> Simo
>>>>
>>>> [1] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/sandbox/digester3/trunk
>>>>
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
>>>> http://www.99soft.org/
>>>>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
