On 18 May 2011 17:46, Matt Benson <gudnabr...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 11:32 AM, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Why doesn't a Range does extend Pair? It's pretty clear (to me at least) >> that a range is a pair of values. >> >> Because the Pair is in our tuple package, it means that it should follow >> tuple logic and be thought of as an ordered list of elements, in this case >> two elements. >> >> The methods that Range has that are not in Pair could be moved there. >> > > IMHO a Range is not precisely a Pair, though it could define its > _limits_ in those terms.
The combined opinion of all at OpenGamma ($dayjob) is that a Range is a very different beast to a Pair. Simply because there are two data points, does not make it a pair :-) Stephen --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
