On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 11:32 AM, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote: > Why doesn't a Range does extend Pair? It's pretty clear (to me at least) > that a range is a pair of values. > > Because the Pair is in our tuple package, it means that it should follow > tuple logic and be thought of as an ordered list of elements, in this case > two elements. > > The methods that Range has that are not in Pair could be moved there. >
IMHO a Range is not precisely a Pair, though it could define its _limits_ in those terms. Matt > -- > Thank you, > Gary > > http://garygregory.wordpress.com/ > http://garygregory.com/ > http://people.apache.org/~ggregory/ > http://twitter.com/GaryGregory > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
