On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 3:41 PM, Torsten Curdt <tcu...@vafer.org> wrote:
> Why are you using the jars from the app server would be my question. * Because I wouldn't want to modify the installation? * Because I'd like to deliver my application to customers so that they can deploy in an unmodified environment? * Because it works fine that way with the current policy? Pick your choice. > IMO that's irrelevant as the users decide whether they upgrade or not. You don't get the point. With the commons libraries, there frequently isn't *the* user. In the scenario I outlined above, there are at least 3 different "users" (from a commons perspective): - The quality managers and or programmers that decide what's destributed as part of the application server. - The application programmers (like me), that build generic applications which are running within this application server. - The customers programmers which are customizing or using the applications I have built. Decisions aren't done unilaterally. Jochen -- I Am What I Am And That's All What I Yam (Popeye) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
