On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 10:16 AM, Torsten Curdt <tcu...@vafer.org> wrote:
> * source compatibility for x.*.* Disagreed. I can quote numerous examples of application servers that come with varying versions of commons-foo, even within my employers house. Your proposal would mean that I had to create varying jar files of the applications shared library, depending on the application server. I am quite happy with our current policy, that we either maintain binary compatibility or change the package name. OTOH, I do support every attempt to drop old stuff by doing the latter. Jochen -- I Am What I Am And That's All What I Yam (Popeye) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
