Phil, I like the concrete class idea as well.
Cheers, - Ole On 03/20/2011 01:28 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
Quite a few methods have been added to RandomDataImpl that are not in RandomData. The methods were added to the impl class only to preserve backward compatibility in versions 1 and 2. In 3.0, we now have the choice to add the methods to the interface or even dispense with the interface altogether. Personally, I am leaning in the direction to just make RandomData a concrete class and move the implementations in RandomDataImpl into that class. Early on, we thought that RandomData might be a relatively small but useful interface. What I think now is that the more valuable interface/implementation separation is at the lower level of random generators, which is enabled in RandomDataImpl. What do others think about this? Phil --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
