Le 20/03/2011 19:28, Phil Steitz a écrit : > Quite a few methods have been added to RandomDataImpl that are not > in RandomData. The methods were added to the impl class only to > preserve backward compatibility in versions 1 and 2. In 3.0, we now > have the choice to add the methods to the interface or even dispense > with the interface altogether. Personally, I am leaning in the > direction to just make RandomData a concrete class and move the > implementations in RandomDataImpl into that class. Early on, we > thought that RandomData might be a relatively small but useful > interface. What I think now is that the more valuable > interface/implementation separation is at the lower level of random > generators, which is enabled in RandomDataImpl. > > What do others think about this?
I also think the RandomDataImpl layer adds too much complexity for users. +1 to merge it in RandomData. Luc > > Phil > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
