Stephen Colebourne wrote: > Based on what I know of OGNL, it is/was reasonably well used. Trying > to merge it into another project doesn't help those existing users. > > The question is what are the author(s) of OGNL looking for? A home for > maintainance? The Apache brand? To reinvigorate it? The latter fits > with a merger into other projects. The former should make commons ask > if it wants to become a home for maintainance mode (not necessarily a > bad thing). > > I'm certainly arguing against a straight push into BeanUtils or JEXL.
+1 - Jörg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
