Hi Henri, it would be fine for me, I initially suggested BeanUtils because already support a similar feature[1], but JEXL2 would work as well. Thanks for your feedbacks, looking forward to collect enough thoughts to call for a vote :) Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://www.99soft.org/ On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 6:37 PM, henrib <hen...@apache.org> wrote: > Howdy; > I looked at OGNL a while ago and can't fully remember why I ended up using > JEXL (probably because it seemed simpler). Anyway, OGNL seems very powerful > and expressive. > What about trying to merge OGNL & JEXL2 (instead of BeanUtils)? I'm pretty > sure the core JEXL2 features (introspector - method /static / ctor calls, > arithmetic) could be leveraged easily. The main differences would be in the > upper parts I guess (syntax, constructs). > It probably could help define a better scripting engine and language in the > future rather than overlapping ones. > Thoughts ? > Henrib > > -- > View this message in context: > http://apache-commons.680414.n4.nabble.com/OGNL-as-a-part-of-Commons-tp3085026p3330241.html > Sent from the Commons - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org