Hi Henri,
it would be fine for me, I initially suggested BeanUtils because
already support a similar feature[1], but JEXL2 would work as well.
Thanks for your feedbacks, looking forward to collect enough thoughts
to call for a vote :)
Simo

http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/



On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 6:37 PM, henrib <hen...@apache.org> wrote:
> Howdy;
> I looked at OGNL a while ago and can't fully remember why I ended up using
> JEXL (probably because it seemed simpler). Anyway, OGNL seems very powerful
> and expressive.
> What about trying to merge OGNL & JEXL2 (instead of BeanUtils)? I'm pretty
> sure the core JEXL2 features (introspector - method /static / ctor calls,
> arithmetic) could be leveraged easily. The main differences would be in the
> upper parts I guess (syntax, constructs).
> It probably could help define a better scripting engine and language in the
> future rather than overlapping ones.
> Thoughts ?
> Henrib
>
> --
> View this message in context: 
> http://apache-commons.680414.n4.nabble.com/OGNL-as-a-part-of-Commons-tp3085026p3330241.html
> Sent from the Commons - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Reply via email to