On 2010-11-24, sebb wrote: > On 24 November 2010 09:46, Stefan Bodewig <bode...@apache.org> wrote: >> On 2010-11-22, Jörg Schaible wrote:
>>> Stefan Bodewig wrote: >>>> The commons-lang3 builds fail[2] and too me it looks as if this was >>>> because AWT is not running in headless mode, >> confirmed by passing -DargLine=-Djava.awt.headless=true to mvn - the >> builds now pass. >>>> I am suprised the problem doesn't show up in the other CI builds. >> Still surprised 8-) >> It doesn't show up inside Gump on Linux or FreeBSD running OpenJDK or >> the FreeBSD port of Sun's VM either - maybe this codebase's AWT detects >> there is no X-Server and switches to headless mode without any help. > Or are those nodes running a frame buffer (I think that is the correct name)? I don't recall installing Xvfb (the X server running in a virtual frame buffer) but it could have been pulled in as a dependency - and I'm pretty sure we don't start it even if it is installed. No, I don't think the builds have any X server to connect to. > Since there are headless hosts, maybe code which is supposed to be > able to run anywhere (e.g. LANG) needs to take this into account? > I.e. Perhaps MacGump has found a bug in Lang? The tests that failed are the ones for the event package. I don't see any uses of AWT in the main code but the tests use AWT classes (ActionEvent and ActionListener). It seems as if the static initializer of either class already requires a working window system on a Mac - it may not be required on OpenJDK's AWT. I don't think the lang3 code requires a window system - so no bug in the main code - but its tests do. Stefan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
