Hi,
Here is my rule: "if the binary compatibility is broken in a significant way, then the package/artifactId must change, however all binary incompatibility should be avoided wherever possbile".
How can one usesuch an ill-defined notion as 'significant' in the defini- tion of a **rule**? Either binary compatibility is broken or it is not, it does not matter how many other packages are impacted. Dim. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Dimitri Pourbaix * Institut d'Astronomie et d'Astrophysique * Don't worry, be happy CP 226, office 2.N4.211, building NO * and CARPE DIEM. Universite Libre de Bruxelles * Boulevard du Triomphe * Tel : +32-2-650.35.71 B-1050 Bruxelles * Fax : +32-2-650.42.26 http://sb9.astro.ulb.ac.be/~pourbaix * mailto:pourb...@astro.ulb.ac.be --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
