On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 12:00 PM, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> wrote: > > I disagree. The "rule" should be that a new package and artifactId is > required when compatibility is broken, not when a version change occurs. > Exceptions should be based on that policy, not on a version change occurs. >
Ok, so how about we change the rule? We could say "if the binary compatibility is broken, then the package/artifactId must change." Again, this rule can be broken if a component feels they need to do so and they provide a very good reason. :) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
