Hi all, I'm personally more with Dennis' opinion, but that's just mine idea.
Question to fill the lack of my knowledge: which is the apache way when not everybody agrees with one opinion and an important decision - like this - has to be taken? Many thanks in advance, have a nice day, Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://www.99soft.org/ On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 12:24 PM, Jörg Schaible <joerg.schai...@gmx.de> wrote: > James Carman wrote: > >> If you change the group id, it's probably best to go ahead and change >> the package names also, in case two versions show up on the same >> classpath. Maven won't know that org.apache.commons:common-pool is >> the same as commons-pool:commons-pool, so it would potentially put >> both on the classpath. I believe there are also binary compatibility >> issues (hence the 2.0), so changing that would mean we'd want to >> change it also. > > +1 > > - Jörg > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
