Hi all mates, please help me, even if I temporary fixed the compiler issue, I didn't understand why
<K,V> void prefill(final KeyedObjectPool<K,V> keyedPool, final K key, final int count) throws Exception, IllegalArgumentException <K,V> void prefill(final KeyedObjectPool<K,V> keyedPool, final Collection<K> keys, final int count) throws Exception, IllegalArgumentException when using Object as K so problem is represented. Please help me understand because it's driving me crazy. I noticed Eclipse ignores it, javac from command line not... Many thanks in advance for saving my mental health :) Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://www.99soft.org/ On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 8:20 AM, Simone Tripodi <simone.trip...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > sorry I'm late due to my local timezone :S I'm currently working to > humorize the Java6 compiler, I hope to fix the compilation problems > ASAP. > About the Ant build, on [digester] too we decided to drop Ant in favor > of Maven build only, I don't know if it could help on taking a > decision. > Have a nice day, > Simo > > PS follow below my previous test: > > $ uname -a > Darwin Simones-Computer-2.local 10.4.0 Darwin Kernel Version 10.4.0: > Fri Apr 23 18:28:53 PDT 2010; root:xnu-1504.7.4~1/RELEASE_I386 i386 > > $ java -version > java version "1.5.0_24" > Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build > 1.5.0_24-b02-357-10M3065) > Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.5.0_24-149, mixed mode, sharing) > > $ mvn -version > Apache Maven 3.0 (r1004208; 2010-10-04 13:50:56+0200) > Java version: 1.5.0_24 > Java home: /XXX/1.5.0/Home > Default locale: en_US, platform encoding: MacRoman > OS name: "mac os x" version: "10.6.4" arch: "i386" Family: "unix" > > $ mvn test > ... > Tests run: 256, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0 > > [INFO] > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > [INFO] BUILD SUCCESS > [INFO] > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ > http://www.99soft.org/ > > > > On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 1:52 AM, Niall Pemberton > <niall.pember...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 12:41 AM, Phil Steitz <phil.ste...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On 10/11/10 7:29 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: >>>>> >>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>> From: Phil Steitz [mailto:phil.ste...@gmail.com] >>>>> Sent: Monday, October 11, 2010 16:13 >>>>> To: Commons Developers List >>>>> Subject: Re: [POOL] can the CheckedObjectPool be removed when introducing >>>>> Java5 generics? >>>>> >>>>> On 10/11/10 6:40 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> This is odd, I get: >>>>>> >>>>>> [INFO] >>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> >>>>> --- >>>>>> >>>>>> [ERROR] BUILD FAILURE >>>>>> [INFO] >>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> >>>>> --- >>>>>> >>>>>> [INFO] Compilation failure >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> \Users\ggregory\b\svn\apache.org\commons\pool\src\test\org\apache\commons\pool >>>>> \TestPoolUtils.java:[496,21] reference to prefill is ambiguous, both >>>>> method<K,V>prefill(org.apac >>>>>> >>>>>> he.commons.pool.KeyedObjectPool<K,V>,K,int) in >>>>> >>>>> org.apache.commons.pool.PoolUtils and >>>>> >>>>> method<K,V>prefill(org.apache.commons.pool.KeyedObjectPool<K,V>,java.util.Coll >>>>> ection<K>,i >>>>>> >>>>>> nt) in org.apache.commons.pool.PoolUtils match >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> \Users\ggregory\b\svn\apache.org\commons\pool\src\test\org\apache\commons\pool >>>>> \TestPoolUtils.java:[506,17] reference to prefill is ambiguous, both >>>>> method<K,V>prefill(org.apac >>>>>> >>>>>> he.commons.pool.KeyedObjectPool<K,V>,K,int) in >>>>> >>>>> org.apache.commons.pool.PoolUtils and >>>>> >>>>> method<K,V>prefill(org.apache.commons.pool.KeyedObjectPool<K,V>,java.util.Coll >>>>> ection<K>,i >>>>>> >>>>>> nt) in org.apache.commons.pool.PoolUtils match >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> \Users\ggregory\b\svn\apache.org\commons\pool\src\test\org\apache\commons\pool >>>>> \TestPoolUtils.java:[514,17] reference to prefill is ambiguous, both >>>>> method<K,V>prefill(org.apac >>>>>> >>>>>> he.commons.pool.KeyedObjectPool<K,V>,K,int) in >>>>> >>>>> org.apache.commons.pool.PoolUtils and >>>>> >>>>> method<K,V>prefill(org.apache.commons.pool.KeyedObjectPool<K,V>,java.util.Coll >>>>> ection<K>,i >>>>>> >>>>>> nt) in org.apache.commons.pool.PoolUtils match >>>>>> >>>>>> I am using Maven 2.2.1 with Oracle Java 1.6.0_21 on Windows Vista 64 >>>>>> bit. >>>>>> >>>>>> Ant does not build because it expects a specific version of JUnit to be >>>>>> in >>>>> >>>>> place, which makes me wish we either did: >>>>>> >>>>>> - Ant and JUnit to the same way [IO] does it. >>>>>> - Remove the ant build. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks for patching the Ant build, Gary and thanks in advance for >>>>> fixing this problem :) >>>>> >>>>> I would really like to keep the Ant build working. >>>> >>>> In SVN: I fixed up the Ant build to use Junit jar from M2 local >>>> repository, the same way we do for IO. Which makes me wonder if we should >>>> use Ivy for Ant builds? Ideally, we should pick Ant or Maven, maintaining >>>> both it a pain. >>>> >>> >>> A mild pain for us, but important for the many, many users who do not use >>> Maven :) >>> >> >> Why would anyone not use maven!!! ;) >> >> http://s.apache.org/m3blog >> >> ...joking aside though - if people are prepared to maintain the ant >> builds (and I am for the components I work on) then no need to get rid >> of them. >> >> Niall >> >> P.S. I only just found the Apache URL shortening service, which is cool: >> >> http://blogs.apache.org/infra/entry/s_apache_org_uri_shortening >> >>> Phil >>>> >>>> Gary >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Phil >>>>>> >>>>>> Gary >>>>>> >>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>> From: Simone Tripodi [mailto:simone.trip...@gmail.com] >>>>>> Sent: Monday, October 11, 2010 14:44 >>>>>> To: Commons Developers List >>>>>> Subject: Re: [POOL] can the CheckedObjectPool be removed when >>>>>> introducing >>>>> >>>>> Java5 generics? >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi Phil, all interested, >>>>>> I just committed r1021517 that contains the Generics feature, all tests >>>>> >>>>> pass: >>>>>> >>>>>> Tests run: 256, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0 >>>>>> >>>>>> [INFO] >>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> >>>>> --- >>>>>> >>>>>> [INFO] BUILD SUCCESS >>>>>> [INFO] >>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> >>>>> --- >>>>>> >>>>>> [INFO] Total time: 2:04.065s >>>>>> [INFO] Finished at: Mon Oct 11 23:32:07 CEST 2010 >>>>>> [INFO] Final Memory: 8M/508M >>>>>> [INFO] >>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> >>>>> --- >>>>>> >>>>>> Please take a look/review if you have some spire time, after that, if >>>>>> you agree, I'd like to start working on fixing/removing deprecations, >>>>>> just let me know. >>>>>> Thanks in advance, have a nice day, >>>>>> Simo >>>>>> >>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ >>>>>> http://www.99soft.org/ >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 10:43 PM, Simone Tripodi >>>>>> <simone.trip...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks for the support Phil!!! I'm going to terminate the work on >>>>>>> generics - the attached patch on the issue provided a small subset of >>>>>>> the whole feature - after that I already planned working on >>>>>>> deprecation stuff, I'm sure we can make the pool much easier. >>>>>>> Have a nice day, I'll keep you updated! >>>>>>> Simo >>>>>>> >>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ >>>>>>> http://www.99soft.org/ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 5:31 PM, Phil Steitz<phil.ste...@gmail.com> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Yep. Good point, Matt. Thanks! Simo pls do continue to point out >>>>> >>>>> candidates for deprecation / removal. I would personally like to see >>>>> pool >>>>> skinnied down a little in 2.0, with some of the specialized pools >>>>> introduced >>>>> to workaround problems in earlier impls removed. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Oct 10, 2010, at 9:09 PM, Simone Tripodi<simone.trip...@gmail.com> >>>>> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thanks for your feedback Matt, >>>>>>>>> maybe I got blind because of the generics strong typing, but it would >>>>>>>>> make sense in he scenario when an existing ObjectPool<?> instance >>>>>>>>> doesn't expose the raw type. >>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>> Simo >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ >>>>>>>>> http://www.99soft.org/ >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 5:00 PM, Matt Benson<gudnabr...@gmail.com> >>>>> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Oct 10, 2010, at 9:14 AM, Simone Tripodi wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Hi all pool team, >>>>>>>>>>> I've been working on introducing generics in the pool on trunk, I >>>>>>>>>>> noticed the CheckedObjectPool could lose its power when the pool >>>>>>>>>>> will >>>>>>>>>>> use the generics. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I don't work on [pool], but I would think that there would be a high >>>>> >>>>> likelihood of a pool's being configured e.g. by a dependency injection >>>>> container, so IMO a checked pool is still relevant. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -Matt >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> So, can this class (and relative static methods) be removed from >>>>>>>>>>> PoolUtils[1], or do you have suggestions why/how to maintain it? >>>>>>>>>>> Many thanks in advance, have a nice day, >>>>>>>>>>> Simo >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> [1] >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/pool/trunk/src/java/org/apache >>>>> /commons/pool/PoolUtils.java >>>>>>>>>>> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >> >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
