Thanks for your feedback Matt, maybe I got blind because of the generics strong typing, but it would make sense in he scenario when an existing ObjectPool<?> instance doesn't expose the raw type. Thanks, Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://www.99soft.org/ On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 5:00 PM, Matt Benson <gudnabr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Oct 10, 2010, at 9:14 AM, Simone Tripodi wrote: > >> Hi all pool team, >> I've been working on introducing generics in the pool on trunk, I >> noticed the CheckedObjectPool could lose its power when the pool will >> use the generics. > > I don't work on [pool], but I would think that there would be a high > likelihood of a pool's being configured e.g. by a dependency injection > container, so IMO a checked pool is still relevant. > > -Matt > >> So, can this class (and relative static methods) be removed from >> PoolUtils[1], or do you have suggestions why/how to maintain it? >> Many thanks in advance, have a nice day, >> Simo >> >> [1] >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/pool/trunk/src/java/org/apache/commons/pool/PoolUtils.java >> >> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ >> http://www.99soft.org/ >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
