Hi, While fixing MATH-405, I noticed that some unit tests were failing with the corrected version! Obviously, some results against which those tests are competing were obtained ... with the bugged code. The usefulness of such tests is therefore pretty limited.
It also appears that the Cartesian norm of a vector (in AbstractRealVector, in AbstractLeastSquares, ...) does not care at all about overflow or underflow. I thus translated enorm.f (minpack) into Java. My initial intend was to put in AbstractLeastSquares but it might be more useful in a more general location (MathUitls). What do you think? Regards, Dim. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Dimitri Pourbaix * Institut d'Astronomie et d'Astrophysique * Don't worry, be happy CP 226, office 2.N4.211, building NO * and CARPE DIEM. Universite Libre de Bruxelles * Boulevard du Triomphe * Tel : +32-2-650.35.71 B-1050 Bruxelles * Fax : +32-2-650.42.26 http://sb9.astro.ulb.ac.be/~pourbaix * mailto:pourb...@astro.ulb.ac.be --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
