On Jul 20, 2010, at 1:01 PM, James Carman wrote: > On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 1:51 PM, Matt Benson <gudnabr...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Not quite. I would like to move the RecordedInvocation class to some sort >> of support package where it can be reused beyond InvocationRecorder, e.g. in >> the code I'll be working on. Perhaps a rename of the class too, though I'm >> not sure what makes the most sense. >> > > Yeah, I think all the recording stuff should be in its own module, > commons-proxy-recorder perhaps?
The recorder as it stands looks like a mocking tool, yes? I agree this doesn't really seem to be core... my initial feeling is that I would be afraid to proliferate arbitrarily numerous focused modules; however, I think it's quite likely that a fully Maven-savvy worldview would rather encourage such a project structure, so I won't complain if you would rather go that way than, e.g., have a single extensions module with numerous offered subpackages and, correspondingly, potentially multiple sets of optional dependencies. Did any of that read sensibly? I'll respond to the rest on a separate thread, lest we get too far OT. -Matt [SNIP] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
