On Jul 20, 2010, at 10:44 AM, James Carman wrote: > On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 11:05 AM, Matt Benson <gudnabr...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Yep, 3.0... we'd need to get a snapshot published from [lang], which should >> be dead easy now that we're using Nexus in the parent POM. >> > > I say go for it.
I'll put that in the mental inbox. > As for the recording stuff, have you committed your > changes? Not yet; I haven't quite finished putting the concept in the context of [proxy] to determine how the API should look. RSN... what I've been working on is cleaning up warnings and adding javadocs. I find it's a good way to do something constructive while familiarizing myself with a codebase. > Is the recording not what you were looking for? Not quite. I would like to move the RecordedInvocation class to some sort of support package where it can be reused beyond InvocationRecorder, e.g. in the code I'll be working on. Perhaps a rename of the class too, though I'm not sure what makes the most sense. Thanks, Matt > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
