On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 1:30 AM, Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> wrote: > On 24/02/2010 09:05, Henri Yandell wrote: >> >> On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 1:00 AM, Henri Yandell<flame...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 12:52 AM, Bill Barker<billwbar...@verizon.net> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> -------------------------------------------------- >>>> From: "jean-frederic clere"<jfcl...@gmail.com> >>>> Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2010 11:48 PM >>>> To:<dev@commons.apache.org> >>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Daemon 1.0.2 based on RC2 >>>> >>>>> On 02/23/2010 09:02 AM, Mladen Turk wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Daemon RC2 fixes some minor distribution issues over the >>>>>> previous RC1 proposal. >>>>>> >>>>>> RC2 Release is here: >>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~mturk/daemon/ >>>>>> Tag is here: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/daemon/tags/COMMONS_DAEMON_1_0_2_RC2/ >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> If voted for a release the COMMONS_DAEMON_1_0_2_RC2 tag will >>>>>> be copied to COMMONS_DAEMON_1_0_2 and released as such. >>>>>> >>>>>> --------------- >>>>>> [X] +1 I support this release >>>>> >>>> >>>> Ok, so we have three people listed as developers for this project >>>> approving >>>> the release, including the author of the three remaining disputed files. >>>> Can >>>> we get a couple more votes, to actually release this? >>> >>> Is the objection to the -1 that the files should never contain the AL >>> header, or is the objection that it shouldn't be a release blocker? >> >> Scratch that - I see that the files have had headers added by Bill. >> >> Sebb - I don't think this is a release blocker. The three Makefiles >> are pretty piddly, and it's fixed for a subsequent version. Wondering >> if you can reconsider on your -1. > > It doesn't matter. Releases can not be vetoed. Period. > > At my count this release has three +1 votes and one -1 vote. That is > sufficient for a release. It is up to the release manager to decide if the > issues raised by the -1 vote are sufficient to stop the release or if they > want to go ahead with the release. Unless I have completely misunderstood > Mladen's views, he wants to go ahead with this and he now has the votes to > do so.
Fair enough. That is what http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html says, though I don't recall this list not working to consensus for a release. Hen --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
