On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 1:00 AM, Henri Yandell <flame...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 12:52 AM, Bill Barker <billwbar...@verizon.net> wrote: >> >> >> -------------------------------------------------- >> From: "jean-frederic clere" <jfcl...@gmail.com> >> Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2010 11:48 PM >> To: <dev@commons.apache.org> >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Daemon 1.0.2 based on RC2 >> >>> On 02/23/2010 09:02 AM, Mladen Turk wrote: >>>> >>>> Daemon RC2 fixes some minor distribution issues over the >>>> previous RC1 proposal. >>>> >>>> RC2 Release is here: >>>> http://people.apache.org/~mturk/daemon/ >>>> Tag is here: >>>> >>>> https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/daemon/tags/COMMONS_DAEMON_1_0_2_RC2/ >>>> >>>> >>>> If voted for a release the COMMONS_DAEMON_1_0_2_RC2 tag will >>>> be copied to COMMONS_DAEMON_1_0_2 and released as such. >>>> >>>> --------------- >>>> [X] +1 I support this release >>> >> >> Ok, so we have three people listed as developers for this project approving >> the release, including the author of the three remaining disputed files. Can >> we get a couple more votes, to actually release this? > > Is the objection to the -1 that the files should never contain the AL > header, or is the objection that it shouldn't be a release blocker?
Scratch that - I see that the files have had headers added by Bill. Sebb - I don't think this is a release blocker. The three Makefiles are pretty piddly, and it's fixed for a subsequent version. Wondering if you can reconsider on your -1. Hen --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
