On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 9:58 AM, Luc Maisonobe <luc.maison...@free.fr> wrote: > Torsten Curdt a écrit : >>> We use some commons projects in one of our commercial products that >>> uses in-browser applets. Size is very important for some of our >>> customers who have clients connecting in from geographically remote >>> outstations over links with about as much bandwidth as a piece of wet >>> string. >>> >>> We ship the workstations with the JRE installed so that's never a >>> problem, but maintaining a connection long enough for the browser >>> download and cache all the necessary jars almost always is. >>> >>> Note that I'm not opposed to a consolidated commons distribution, it's >>> just that you should understand why size does matter for some >>> applications. >> >> Sure, but how many users have that requirement? More than 1%? > > Even if it is 1%, it's worth considering. I am really not comfortable > with project addressing only the 80% more frequent cases. Minority > should never be neglected. It's clearly a philosophical and personal choice.
Torsten addressed it by writing Jarjar :) Hen --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
