On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 5:30 PM, Phil Steitz<phil.ste...@gmail.com> wrote: > Niall Pemberton wrote: >> >> Artefacts look good, tests OK on JDK 1.5 and 1.6. >> >> Was just wondering about the signed m2 artifacts? >> > > Those will be identical to the jars in the binary distribution. I can > upload an image of the m2 repo directory including sigs, hashes, jars, pom > for inspection; but I view the tars/zips as what we are releasing - in fact > really just the src. > <snip/>
You're correct that the source is the key component ofcourse. I'm more comfortable seeing m2 artifacts staged both as an RM and as someone looking at RCs to vote on (since I suspect a sizeable percentage of folks get our libraries out of m2 central and its mirrors these days). I haven't looked at the artifacts yet. -Rahul --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
