Rahul Akolkar wrote:
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 5:30 PM, Phil Steitz<phil.ste...@gmail.com> wrote:
Niall Pemberton wrote:
Artefacts look good, tests OK on JDK 1.5 and 1.6.
Was just wondering about the signed m2 artifacts?
Those will be identical to the jars in the binary distribution. I can
upload an image of the m2 repo directory including sigs, hashes, jars, pom
for inspection; but I view the tars/zips as what we are releasing - in fact
really just the src.
<snip/>
You're correct that the source is the key component ofcourse. I'm more
comfortable seeing m2 artifacts staged both as an RM and as someone
looking at RCs to vote on (since I suspect a sizeable percentage of
folks get our libraries out of m2 central and its mirrors these days).
I haven't looked at the artifacts yet.
I put the signed m2 artifacts in a subdirectory here:
http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/commons-math-2.0-RC4/maven/
Phil
-Rahul
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
