Found no other points than the ones already mentioned in this vote thread.
So +1 Oliver Niall Pemberton schrieb:
I have prepared a second release candidate for Codec 1.4 following the feedback (thanks!) from the first. [ ] +1 Yes go ahead an release based on RC2 [ ] -1 No, because... The tag for RC2 is here: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/codec/tags/CODEC_1_4_RC2/ The release artefacts are here http://people.apache.org/~niallp/codec-1.4-rc2/ Site is available here: http://people.apache.org/~niallp/codec-1.4-rc2/site/ (note: some links are relative and will be broken until deployed to proper codec home) RAT Report: http://people.apache.org/~niallp/codec-1.4-rc2/site/rat-report.html CLIRR Report: http://people.apache.org/~niallp/codec-1.4-rc2/site/clirr-report.html Release Notes: http://people.apache.org/~niallp/codec-1.4-rc2/site/changes-report.html http://people.apache.org/~niallp/codec-1.4-rc2/RELEASE-NOTES.txt Thanks Niall --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
