On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 9:19 AM, Henrib <hbies...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Looking at the number of issues, commits & messages, it looks like JEXL does > not have a very voicefull community; are there still some committers around > or is the project in a semi-abandoned state? > If so, I suppose it would be OK to "fork" a JEXL2 project (probably as a > Google project ) so some features could be added. It would stay true to the > Apache original and could be unforked if ever needed. > Opinions, alternatives ? <snip/>
In addition to what has been said already, a couple of comments about JEXL-55 [1]: * I understand its convenient to attach one zip, but it makes it a little harder to review (ideally, there'd be multiple changesets, one for each feature -- see if some such is possible, that may increase that chance that someone looks at it). * I'd also recommend filing an ICLA [2] since it looks like there could be large changes in that proposal, and we require that for larger contributions. Details about sending in the ICLA are on the form itself, let us know if you have any questions about it. -Rahul [1] http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JEXL-55 [2] http://www.apache.org/licenses/icla.txt --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
