--- On Tue, 5/19/09, Jochen Wiedmann <jochen.wiedm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> From: Jochen Wiedmann <jochen.wiedm...@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: commons-logging version 0.0.0-EMPTY
> To: "Commons Developers List" <dev@commons.apache.org>
> Date: Tuesday, May 19, 2009, 9:40 AM
> On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 2:46 PM, Ceki
> Gulcu <c...@qos.ch>
> wrote:
>
> > Jochen, you do realize that global exclusions would
> suffer from the same
> > problems as you described in the A B C scenario. Here
> is a slightly modified
> > version of your scenario.
>
> May be, but I'd rather have the overall Maven community
> work on that
> than our isolated group create a special solution for a
> problem, which
> isn't even ours. (Sorry!)
Come to think of it, it occurs to me to wonder what happens if the would-be
user of 0.0.0-EMPTY declares an explicit provided dependency on [logging]. Can
anyone say?
-Matt
>
> Jochen
>
>
> --
> Don't trust a government that doesn't trust you.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
