Bill, I strongly discourage adding these methods at this time. We will regret it.
If you don't want to change (i.e. add new methods) to an interface, then the sensible thing is to omit these interfaces for 2.0 and introduce them with 2.1. Bill Barker wrote: > > What I actually went for is to add getSparcity to the SparseRealVector > interface (should be easy to calculate in one dimension, and mostly useful > for DEBUG level logging, so stubbing it shouldn't be a problem if not), > and > getShape for the SparseRealMatrix interface that returns an enum that > currently only has the value of 'Any'. > > I really don't like the idea of changing the API between minor releases, > so > put in place-holders for what seems to be the consensus for going forward. > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/commons-math%2C-matrix-toolkits-java-and-consolidation-tp23537813p23611886.html Sent from the Commons - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
