On 21/04/2009, Jochen Wiedmann <jochen.wiedm...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 3:30 PM, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> > wrote: > > > They both allow the implementation > > to be chosen when you package your application - without recompliling > > anything. > > > The last time we had that discussion, this has been denied. If there > is new information, I'd like to listen.
Well, the SLF4J website specifically says it is not necessary to recompile: http://www.slf4j.org/manual.html#swapping i.e. SLF4J chooses the logging implementation based in which logging implementation it finds on the classpath; there must be only one such. I'm not saying SLF4J is better or worse than CL, but they both allow the implementation to be configured without recompilation. > Jochen > > > > -- > I have always wished for my computer to be as easy to use as my > telephone; my wish has come true because I can no longer figure out > how to use my telephone. > > -- (Bjarne Stroustrup, > http://www.research.att.com/~bs/bs_faq.html#really-say-that > My guess: Nokia E50) > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
