Ralph Goers wrote at Mittwoch, 15. April 2009 09:20: > > On Apr 14, 2009, at 11:40 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote: >>> >> >> Yes and no, since it was never the goal of CL to add additional >> functionality, but to provide a facade for the lowest common set of >> functionality (and originally it was Log4J that prevented the >> addition of >> the trace level ;-). >> >> See, we have some global players as customers and all of them use an >> own >> logging framework that provides explicit support for their operation >> management. However, all provide at least a factory for CL. > > More and more of them are supporting SLF4J. Heck, even Apache projects > are switching.
Well, some global players tend to have a different idea about adapting new technology into their core frameworks. I am glad, that we could use at least Java 5 since last fall ;-) [snip] - Jörg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
