My guess would be that an obvious lack in [logging] is that of message
parameterization to avoid isDebug, etc. check blocks when building expensive
log messages.
-Matt
P.S. I'm also interested in what your revolutionary-sounding ideas were,
Torsten.
--- On Tue, 4/14/09, Torsten Curdt <tcu...@apache.org> wrote:
> From: Torsten Curdt <tcu...@apache.org>
> Subject: Re: [Configuration] experimental branch uses java.util.logging?
> To: "Commons Developers List" <dev@commons.apache.org>
> Date: Tuesday, April 14, 2009, 3:48 PM
> > Valid points. The main issue I
> have with Commons Logging is just that it is
> > too minimal. But that can easily be addressed. But I
> do have a couple of
> > comments.
>
> I always thought people were complaining it does too much
> ;-)
>
> Trying hard not to get dragged into logging discussions
> anymore - but
> I am curious: What are you missing?
>
> cheers
> --
> Torsten
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
