My guess would be that an obvious lack in [logging] is that of message parameterization to avoid isDebug, etc. check blocks when building expensive log messages.
-Matt P.S. I'm also interested in what your revolutionary-sounding ideas were, Torsten. --- On Tue, 4/14/09, Torsten Curdt <[email protected]> wrote: > From: Torsten Curdt <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [Configuration] experimental branch uses java.util.logging? > To: "Commons Developers List" <[email protected]> > Date: Tuesday, April 14, 2009, 3:48 PM > > Valid points. The main issue I > have with Commons Logging is just that it is > > too minimal. But that can easily be addressed. But I > do have a couple of > > comments. > > I always thought people were complaining it does too much > ;-) > > Trying hard not to get dragged into logging discussions > anymore - but > I am curious: What are you missing? > > cheers > -- > Torsten > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
