> All that really doesn't say much. IMO it does ;)
> The primary difference is simply around > how the community is run. Exactly > The real question is, if one was to create a commons logging 2.0 what would > it be and would that be a significant improvement over SLF4J and the > existing commons logging? I (might still) have some (very) experimental code. But the "significant improvement over SLF4J" might be debatable ...and I am done debating about logging ;-) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
