On 07/04/2009, Stefan Bodewig <bode...@apache.org> wrote: > On 2009-04-07, Mladen Turk <mt...@apache.org> wrote: > > > Stefan Bodewig wrote: > >> Hi Mladen, > > >> In the later case well need a software grant for it since we cannot > >> simply fork a LGPLed code base under the Apache License. > > > It's not a fork, cause it was never released. > > This was just a testing code to see weather something > > like that was doable. > > > I see. > > > > Since RedHat has CCLA signed I see no problem. >
The Redhat CCLA from 2001 covers all employees of Redhat. Does that apply in this case? Just checking. > The CCLA really mainly covers you. Your ICLA is all that is needed in > the end if you are certain Red Hat is OK with you committing the code > here. > > > > However if Legal department has some concerns > > I can obtain any document needed. > > > It is not strictly necessary and if you are comfortable without a > grant, then I'm with Mark that we shouldn't require more paoerwork > than is needed. > But it might be helpful to document the trail, e.g. in the SVN log message. > Stefan > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
