On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 10:45 PM, Dan Fabulich <d...@fabulich.com> wrote:
> "NEEDS" is a little strong....  I think there's room in the world for a
> backwards-compatible dbutils 1.3 with generics and varargs followed shortly
> afterward by a more thoroughly re-worked dbutils 2.0.

That sounds like a good approach.  Don't leave too many folks out in
the cold.  Good thinking!

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Reply via email to