On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 10:45 PM, Dan Fabulich <d...@fabulich.com> wrote: > "NEEDS" is a little strong.... I think there's room in the world for a > backwards-compatible dbutils 1.3 with generics and varargs followed shortly > afterward by a more thoroughly re-worked dbutils 2.0.
That sounds like a good approach. Don't leave too many folks out in the cold. Good thinking! --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org