Good catch. :-(
Uh, if dbutils 1.1 was compatible with java 1.3, and we want to depend on
java 1.4 in the next version, do we have to call it "dbutils 2.0"?
I assume not; I think we can still call it "dbutils 1.2" even though we
depend on java 1.4 now. Is that OK?
Similarly, could/should we call the java5 version "1.3"? That would
certainly save time on branch management...?
sebb wrote:
The pom.xml does not specify a java source or target version, so
defaults to 1.3 (from the parent pom)
As far as I can tell, the component requires at least 1.4 so the POM
needs to be updated.
[IMO the compiler settings should never be delegated to the parent POM]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
