+1 for JDK 1.5 Luc
Mario Ivankovits a écrit : > Hi! > > Since it is not that easy to get in touch with a jdk 1.3 (or I tried not > hard enough ;-) ) I'd like to ask if everyone is fine to start VFS 2 > with jdk1.5? > > As long as no other development need requires it to enhance the VFS 2 > api I do not plan to introduce generics yet (I don't see that many > places for this in VFS), though sticking with jdk 1.3 seems uncool, no? ;-) > > Seriously, it should really be the right time to leave jdk 1.3 behind. > Since the API might not drastically change it should not be required to > rename the package to vfs5 or vfs2 or whatever. > > If required, JDK 1.4 will do the trick too, though, this is EOL with > October 2008 too. > > [ ] Go on with JDK 1.5 > [ ] Go on with JDK 1.4 > [ ] Stick with JDK 1.3 for the following reason: > > Ciao, > Mario > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
