2008/5/1 Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Thanks for taking a look, Seb.
>
>
>  --- sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>  > 2008/5/1 Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>  > > First, thanks to all those who checked and found
>  > >  issues with RC1!
>  > >
>  > >  The artifacts are here:
>  > >  http://people.apache.org/~mbenson/jxpath-1.3-rc2/
>  > >
>  >
>  > It would be nice if the Javadoc and Source MANIFEST
>  > files contained a
>  > bit more detail.
>  > e.g. Implementation Version, Vendor etc.
>
>  parent?
>
>
>  >
>  > The binary manifest says that the code is designed
>  > for Java 1.3, yet
>  > it was built and tested in Java 1.5.
>  >
>  > M2 requires only Java 1.4, so unless there is any
>  > reason why that
>  > cannot be used, at least it would be closer to the
>  > target version.
>  > This would at least catch any accidental usage of
>  > Java 1.5+ methods.
>
>
>  My primary dev environment is OSX... I guess I could
>  boot to (blecch) Windows in the future...
>

Does OSX not support Java 1.3 or even 1.4?

>
>
>  >
>  > Ant build fails with Java 1.3.1:
>  >
>  >     [junit] Testsuite:
>  > org.apache.commons.jxpath.ri.StressTest
>  >     [junit] Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 1,
>  > Time elapsed: 1.078 sec
>  >     [junit] Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 1,
>  > Time elapsed: 1.078 sec
>  >     [junit]
>  >     [junit] Testcase: testThreads took 0.688 sec
>  >     [junit]     Caused an ERROR
>  >     [junit] null
>  >     [junit] java.lang.NoSuchMethodError
>  >     [junit]     at
>  >
>  
> org.apache.commons.jxpath.ri.StressTest$StressRunnable.run(StressTest.java:81)
>  >     [junit]     at
>  > java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:479)
>  >     [junit]
>  >
>  > Also, the Ant build refers to junit-3.8.2 - this is
>  > not guaranteed to
>  > work with Java 1.3 as there's a assert method that
>  > requires Java 1.4
>  > in it.
>  > This will cause a test failure - if it is used.
>  > [There's a posting
>  > about this in the archives earlier this year.]
>  > I don't think this is the cause of the above error.
>  >
>
>  I'll look into these in the future, then.
>
>
>  > >  The tag is here:
>  > >
>  >
>  http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/jxpath/tags/JXPATH_1_3_RC2/
>  > >
>  >
>  > The rat.xml file is set up to only check Java files.
>  > It should really check all the files apart from
>  > specific exceptions -
>  > e.g. the JavaCC-generated files.
>  > However, there don't appear to be any problems.
>
>  Yep, see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-8 ,
>  which I see has been applied and resolved w/o sending
>  me a notification, hmm.  I'm not aware of what RAT
>  version mvn is pulling, but I can go ahead and mod
>  this in trunk now that they've applied my patch.
>

Nevertheless, you should be scanning all files apart from ones which
RAT is picking up erroneously.

>  >
>  > A few SVN property problems:
>  >
>  > svn pd svn:executable
>  >
>  src/java/org/apache/commons/jxpath/util/JXPath11CompatibleTypeConverter.java
>  > svn pd svn:executable
>  >
>  src/java/org/apache/commons/jxpath/util/ReverseComparator.java
>  > svn pd svn:executable
>  >
>  
> src/test/org/apache/commons/jxpath/ri/model/beans/BadlyImplementedFactoryTest.java
>  >
>  > svn ps svn:eol-style native
>  >
>  src/java/org/apache/commons/jxpath/JXPathAbstractFactoryException.java
>  > svn ps svn:eol-style native
>  >
>  src/java/org/apache/commons/jxpath/JXPathFunctionNotFoundException.java
>  > svn ps svn:eol-style native
>  >
>  src/java/org/apache/commons/jxpath/JXPathInvalidAccessException.java
>  > svn ps svn:eol-style native
>  >
>  src/java/org/apache/commons/jxpath/JXPathInvalidSyntaxException.java
>  > svn ps svn:eol-style native
>  >
>  src/java/org/apache/commons/jxpath/JXPathNotFoundException.java
>  > svn ps svn:eol-style native
>  >
>  src/java/org/apache/commons/jxpath/JXPathTypeConversionException.java
>  >
>  > Not sure about this one; check what the other JSPs
>  > have:
>  >
>  > svn ps svn:eol-style native
>  > src/test-webapp/JXPathTest.jsp
>
>  Noted.
>
>  >
>  > These are not blockers.
>
>  Thanks; do I assume your final vote comes out to a +0,
>  -0, or what?  :)
>

-1 because of the test failure.

>  -Matt
>
>
>
>  > >  Site:
>  > >
>  >
>  http://people.apache.org/~mbenson/jxpath-1.3-rc2/site
>  > >
>  > >  Clirr Report (compared to 1.2; one-shot not
>  > working w/
>  > >  M2)
>  > >
>  >
>  http://people.apache.org/~mbenson/jxpath-1.3-rc2/clirr-report.txt
>  > >
>  > >  I'd be grateful if you can make time to check the
>  > >  artifacts and cast your vote, which will be open
>  > at
>  > >  least until Friday, May 9.
>  > >
>  > >  Thanks,
>  > >  Matt
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >
>  >
>  
> ____________________________________________________________________________________
>  > >  Be a better friend, newshound, and
>  > >  know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now.
>  >
>  http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
>  > >
>  > >
>  >
>  ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>  > >  To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>  > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  > >  For additional commands, e-mail:
>  > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  > >
>  > >
>  >
>  >
>  ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>  > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>  > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  > For additional commands, e-mail:
>  > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >
>  >
>
>
>
>       
> ____________________________________________________________________________________
>  Be a better friend, newshound, and
>  know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now.  
> http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
>
>  ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>  To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to