On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 10:28 AM, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm not convinced that, once you remove the constraint > of a String representation, that what you are talking > about is necessarily an "expression". Also given the > concern I brought up about recording, explicitly > calling getters doesn't AFAICT obviously yield a > result that knows how to accomplish a setValue. >
Also, what I'm proposing would be in the sandbox, so maybe I can get some code in there so that we can look at it. If we don't like it, we can remove it or make it dormant. I just wanted to make sure that the idea of the project doesn't go against the charter. I guess in the strictest sense, it does, since it's somewhat of a "framework." Then again, so is proxy. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
