On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 10:28 AM, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm not convinced that, once you remove the constraint > of a String representation, that what you are talking > about is necessarily an "expression". Also given the > concern I brought up about recording, explicitly > calling getters doesn't AFAICT obviously yield a > result that knows how to accomplish a setValue. >
Yes, the "builder" would be somewhat limited. It wouldn't allow you to build expressions for stuff like indexing into arrays or other more complex situations, but it would cover the simple property traversal situations. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
