On 4/1/08, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 1:45 PM, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > It's almost like we need a two-phase commit here. We do some stuff > > > and then ask everyone "are you okay with that?" What if we staged our > > > releases to an SVN working copy? Then, everyone could look at it and > > > if everyone was okay with it, we could commit the changes and that > > > would somehow be updated in another "live" location on some periodic > > > basis? I'm just thinking out loud here, so be gentle. :) > > > > > <snip/> > > > > I don't know if you meant to say working copy (AIUI, thats a private > copy). > > > > In any case, this deviates sufficiently from the m2 release processes > > around here for me to not want to look into it ATM :-) > > > No, what I meant was that we'd have some working copy sitting around > on the server somewhere for our m2 repository (and our distributions > directory for that matter). Then, we would deploy to that working > copy using m2 (which would update the metadata correctly and > everything). <snip/>
The stage plugin helps us with that (but has its own requirements about staging repos ATM). > Then, we vote on it. Then, if everything looks good, > then someone commits it (may need a release management group or > something for this). Then there would be some process that does an > svn export to a directory that's rsynched to ibiblio. Again, I'm just > thinking here. I kind of like the idea of having an SVN copy of our > M2 repo and distributions directories. > OK, I meant to say this is a larger (set of) change(s). I'll take smaller steps (when I get a chance) as outlined earlier. Shouldn't preclude new ideas. -Rahul --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
