On 1/29/08, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 29/01/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Jan 29, 2008 2:44 PM, Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Jan 29, 2008 6:51 AM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I would prefer to see trunk used for the main development, and > > > > branches for experimental stuff, but of course this changes over time. > > > > > > > > What is important is that the currently active branch(es) and trunk > > > > are cleary documented on the web-site and in SVN - I've seen a STATUS > > > > file used for this, or perhaps a REAME. > > > > This file needs to be at the top-level of trunk (and the contents > > > > should indicate that the latest version is always in trunk) > > > > > > > > For a long while in JMeter the trunk was not where the main dev was > > > > taking place, and this caused quite a few problems (as it was also not > > > > well documented ...). > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, guys. Regarding pool, there is no development right now going > > > on toward the 2.0 stuff, so what makes sense for me is to move the 1.4 > > > code back into trunk and change the pom version to 1.5-SNAPSHOT. I at > > > least will be working bugs, responding to issues and looking at the > > > fairness stuff discussed earlier there, so that makes sense to me. > > > What I am stuck on is the best way to do it in svn. Any advice / > > > suggestions would be appreciated. > > > > TortoiseSVN which I use has a rename command - actually does > > copy/delete - but I would think that would be the best way to go: 1) > > Copy trunk to new POOL2 branch and then remove trunk and then 2) > > copy/delete your 1.4 branch back to trunk. If you want I can do this. > > > > Niall > > > > For renames, one can just use svn move: > > move (mv, rename, ren): Move and/or rename something in working copy > or repository. > usage: move SRC DST > > Note: this subcommand is equivalent to a 'copy' and 'delete'. > Note: the --revision option has no use and is deprecated. > > SRC and DST can both be working copy (WC) paths or URLs: > WC -> WC: move and schedule for addition (with history) > URL -> URL: complete server-side rename. > > This can also be done in Eclipse and probably other IDEs. > > Although it is equivalent to copy/delete, it's probably safer to do it > as one SVN command. >
Thanks and sorry for having to ask simple questions like this, but just to make sure, svn move and svn copy both preserve history, correct? Phil --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]