On Jan 6, 2008 2:23 AM, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Jan 5, 2008 5:51 PM, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I would like to get an IO 1.4 release out in the near future. Looking > > thru the issues tagged for 1.4 I would suggest the following: > > > > 1) Resolve the following issues, which all have patches except IO-149 > > which is trivial > > IO-149 - Make FilenameUtils.EXTENSION_SEPARATOR public > > IO-105 - Add a FileUtils.copyDirectoryStructure method > > IO-152 - Add ByteArrayOutputStream.readFrom(InputStream) > > IO-135 - Add convenience deleteQuietly to FileUtils > > +1 > > > 2) Move the following issues to post-1.4 > > IO-137 - Added method for getting InputStream from > > ByteArrayOutputStream & IOUtils avoiding unnecessary array allocation > > and copy > > IO-51 - Throttled input and output stream classes > > IO-77 - add a convenience FileUtils.move(File src, File dest) > > +1 on IO-77 being post-1.4 as it lacks unit tests. > > I think we should deal with IO-137 as it's a minor enhancement and > comes with tests. I'll volunteer to look at that.
I looked at this a while back and using the baos buffers directly in an InputStream raises a safety issue (if the baos is modified while the InputStream is being read) - do we care about that? > IO-51 has tests, so worth a look at if that can be done before the > others are resolved. ie) punt to post-1.4 iff it's the last one left. I had a brief look and my initial thought was the Limiter should just be doing the throttling and the reading/writing should be in the input/output implementations - but I haven't looked in detail. > > 3) Upgrade to commons-parent-6 pom.xml which looks like the release > > will be approved shortly > > > > Thoughts on this? > > Delete the M1 build, and maybe Ant given that the build.xml is M1 generated. Removing ant is fine by me - I'd like to keep the m1 build as it works - I think we should only delete them when people stop bothering to keep them up to date. > And IO-148 + IO-127? IO-127 was really just a discussion. We haven't actually moved to JDK 1.4 minimum - just introduced 3 impls that require JDK 1.4. The rest is still JDK 1.3 compatible with the source/target options. IO-148 is done from my PoV - I left it open in case anyone wanted to object to me renaming it today. If Gary and Jukka are happy then we can mark it as fixed. > Hen --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
