On 19/11/2007, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > sebb wrote: > > On 19/11/2007, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> sebb wrote: > >>> On 18/11/2007, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>>> Hi > >>>> > >>>> This is the second attempt to release commons-logging 1.1.1. > >>>> > >>>> Changes since the last try: > >>>> - The Maven 2 build now packages LICENSE and NOTICE files in the correct > >>>> place in all distributables > >>>> - A couple of minor bugs were fixed > >>>> > >>>> Release Notes: > >>>> http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310484&styleName=Html&version=12312160 > >>>> > >>>> Tag: > >>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/logging/tags/commons-logging-1.1.1/ > >>>> > >>>> Staged repository: > >>>> http://people.apache.org/~dennisl/staging-repository-commons-logging/ > >>>> > >>>> Distribution files: > >>>> http://people.apache.org/~dennisl/commons-logging-1.1.1.tar.gz > >>>> http://people.apache.org/~dennisl/commons-logging-1.1.1.tar.gz.asc > >>>> http://people.apache.org/~dennisl/commons-logging-1.1.1.zip > >>>> http://people.apache.org/~dennisl/commons-logging-1.1.1.zip.asc > >>>> > >>> Are these the files that are to be released via Apache mirrors? > >> Yes. > >> > >>> If so, then there should be separate binary and source archives, as > >>> per the previous release 1.1: > >>> > >>> http://www.apache.org/dist/commons/logging/ > >> No, there will be only one distributed archive which contains both > >> source and binaries. The archive will be available in .tar.gz and .zip > >> formats. This was decided back when we discussed what should go into a > >> distribution. > > > > AFAICS Logging will be the only Commons project that will no longer > > have separate binary and source archives. > > > > I think that's a retrograde step. > > Here a link to the discussion I mentioned earlier: > http://www.nabble.com/-all--What%27s-in-a-distribution--tf2910639.html#a8132562 >
Thanks - I was having problems finding that. There does not seem to have been a final decision (or even summary) of the e-mail thread, which is a pity. Probably ought to be on the developer section of the commons site. However: http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A--all--What%27s-in-a-distribution--p8133008.html does ask for the whole of SVN to be included. AFAICS, only one message supported having a single combined archive; at least one other message referred to the need to keep archive sizes small. > >>>> Please cast your votes! > >>>> > >>>> [ ] +1, Let's do it > >>>> [ ] -1, Nah > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Here's my +1 > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> Dennis Lundberg > >> -- > >> Dennis Lundberg > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > >> > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > -- > Dennis Lundberg > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
